I had an informative read this week followed by a coherent and related podcast.
First Things has an essay by Carl Truman entitled "Our Marcusan Moment". In this eloquent piece was a link to a 1968 academic work "Repressive Tolerance". The lead paragraph states:
THIS essay examines the idea of tolerance in our advanced industrial society. The conclusion reached is that the realization of the objective of tolerance would call for intolerance toward prevailing policies, attitudes, opinions, and the extension of tolerance to policies, attitudes, and opinions which are outlawed or suppressed. In other words, today tolerance appears again as what it was in its origins, at the beginning of the modern period--a partisan goal, a subversive liberating notion and practice. Conversely, what is proclaimed and practiced as tolerance today, is in many of its most effective manifestations serving the cause of oppression.
I urge you read both.
***
Done yet?
Ideologically loaded Humpty-Dumpty language lives. My question is: to what end are these inversions of language directed?
Is it just breeding resentment and dysfunction? Destroying what currently is to allow to new utopia to be born? A childish tantrum?
Honestly, to what end and is the end worth the destruction?
One discussion from an evangelical perspective is a podcast from HillFaith.blog which discusses Critical Theory with regard to our current cultural moment.
***
Postscript: I suspect that Marlon Brando's character in The Wild One was more honest than Marcuse.
